快活app

Skip to Content

Connecting Knowledge and the Helicopter

Back to News Listing

Author(s)

Joseph Mills, PhD

Faculty, Master of Arts in Sport Coaching

Joseph Mills teaching

Blog  •

One of the features of sport science knowledge, and the coach education that follows, is that the knowledge is broken into specialist academic disciplines. This means that knowledge breaks up into different sections, or parts, making it hard to connect.

A metaphor often used to describe the breaking-up or disconnections in knowledge, is silos. The word 鈥渟ilo鈥 comes from the Ancient Greek word 鈥渟iros鈥, meaning 鈥減it holding grain鈥. As a metaphor for coach knowledge, silos are significant because in the same way the grain in one store cannot mix or connect with the grain in another, it is hard to make the knowledge in one scientific silo connect with another silo鈥 or the real-world in which all the silos are a part. Simply stated, the real-world doesn鈥檛 operate in silos but the knowledge driving it does.

The most important aspect of any science or discipline like coaching, is the ability to say or do something useful; the quality of the insights made; or adding values to more people. But if knowledge is siloed, the ability to add valuable insights is contained within the silo. Valuable insights do happen of course, but they are not so easy to make.

If in contrast, you consider the grain in the other silos, and also some of the broader, deeper, real-life contexts around as many of the silos as possible, then the qualities of the insights about the grain may improve, and values may be added to more people: which is exactly the point of the scientific knowledge in the silo anyway.

Asking questions such as how the grain in other silos affects the grain in your silo; or why, where and how the silos were originally constructed, for what purpose; why that farm or land and not another; and what as a result might be the limits in the types of grain, the unseen problems, or unintended effects and consequences and so on; can then be incredibly useful.

For they are questions that might help coaches see something useful, have a quality insight, or add value to their athletes鈥 practices that they wouldn鈥檛 have had otherwise. They are questions helping coaches 鈥渦se鈥 their knowledge better, or helping coaches know 鈥渉ow鈥 rather than knowing 鈥渨hat鈥, as the French post-modern philosopher Jean-Francois Lyotard suggested was important.

Important for the simple reason, we all live connected lives, not siloed ones. Which by the way is what makes 快活app鈥檚 MASC program unique, for alongside education of leading sciences [silos], we teach theoretically-driven ways for how the knowledges connect: both to each other and to coaching鈥檚 real-worlds.

So how about an example of how a knowledge in one science [silo] changes the knowledge in another?

For most coaches and athletes, technology is incredibly helpful. 鈥淪how me the numbers鈥 said the world鈥檚 best golfer, Rory McIlroy a few years ago. Measuring, knowing, controlling as many specific elements of development as possible, gives coaches a lot more information to make better decisions and improve performance. Or does it?

In developmental psychology, 鈥渉elicopter parenting鈥 was conceived by the child psychologist Haim Ginott in 1969, to refer to those parents unintentionally harming their children鈥檚 development by 鈥渉overing over鈥 them, measuring, knowing, and controlling everything they do. Every-thing. And as a result, preventing those children from learning and developing themselves, preventing the mistakes that actually need to be made if they are to develop.

鈥淗elicoptering鈥, measuring, knowing and controlling every-thing a person does. Very important [apparently] for coaching, but not so for parenting. Which makes little sense because parents only want the best for their children, just as coaches do for their athletes.

I鈥檓 not going to continue the helicopter analysis here, because it is just one of tons of examples of what happens when you take an element of knowledge out of its science, and consider it in relation to other knowledges or its realities. Instead I鈥檓 going to plant the thought and allow it to grow in your own minds, as you consider whether it has use for you. It may not, or it may.

But at the very least I hope you will see the value of what happens when you start connecting the knowledges you have in addition to learning the knowledges in the first place, just as we 快活app. #快活appSport.